Happy Belated Birthday, Jane Austen!

This is THE portrait of Jane Austen, the one and only – a watercolour sketch done by her sister Cassandra. I took this photo at the National Portrait Gallery in London in 2017; last time I was there the Austen portrait wasn’t on display any more.

I missed it: it was Jane Austen’s 250th birthday in December, on the 16th. Darn it, it would have been such a perfect opportunity to celebrate with tea and scones and an Austen movie marathon. (I think with all the DVDs I have, I could probably make it a full 24-hr one.)

Yes, I have at least one movie version of each of the books. Not all of the movies made, but most of them. I have things to say about them… some other time.

The copies of the books I have are the annotated editions I got for my grad school research, more than ten years ago (I took a couple of directed studies courses on Austen, and my prof recommended those Broadview editions). I do somewhere have a really pretty matching illustrated set with gold edging, but, I mean, the text is the same, and the pretty copies have rather small print.

So then, thinking of grad school, I just went back to my research blog, quill and qwerty, and took a look at some of my ramblings there. If you want to check them out, the Austen posts are right here: https://quillandqwerty.wordpress.com/category/jane-austen/ They’re actually quite interesting, even if I say so myself. It’s been long enough since I wrote them that I forgot most of what I said there. Good points, past self!

And, hehe, some of the links I posted to other sites are still active. Like this one to the mashup of the Beauty & the Beast trailer with footage of the 2005 Pride and Prejudice movie. It still cracks me up every time I see it – it just works!

So, apologies, Miss Austen, for having missed your birthday. I would have liked to have celebrated with you.

Life, the Universe, and a Quarter-Millennium of Austen. Happy Belated Birthday!

Enchanted Conversation: “The Case of the Missing Kiss”

An article by Yours Truly just went up on Enchanted Conversation Magazine. Those of you who’ve been reading my ramblings for a while might recognize it: I wrote it in the course of my grad school research and posted it on Quillandqwerty; now EC has kindly republished it.

THE CASE OF THE MISSING KISS

I’ve been studying Frog Prince tales. You know the ones: princess meets frog, he does her a service, in return he asks for a kiss, she kisses him, and hey presto, he’s turned into a handsome prince. Right? Wrong. If you look at the Grimms’ version—tale #1 in the CHILDREN’S AND HOUSEHOLD TALES—you’re doing okay until you get to the kissing part. It’s not there. It quite simply doesn’t exist. The act that gets the prince unfroggified is one of gross violence: the princess chucks the frog against her bedroom wall (in the 1812 version, with a lovely onomatopoeic “Splat!”). That’s right, attempted murder. When he falls down from the wall—I’ve always had trouble visualising that bit—he’s a handsome prince with “friendly eyes,” and the princess happily goes to bed with him.

That’s fine, you say. There are other versions of that story that have the kiss in it, aren’t there? Well, not that I can find, at least in the old tales…

To continue reading, go here

Life, the Universe, and The Case of the Missing Kiss. The things you find out…