Just Me and Art

IMG_20150327_125032

Vancouver Art Gallery

It’s been quite some time since I got to be alone with art (I mean small-a art – visual constructions, not big-A Art – person named Arthur who had his name chopped down to a three-letter word; I don’t know any of the latter). But this past weekend I had some business to do in the big city – Vancouver, to be precise, a five-hour trip over the mountains – and when I was finished with what I had to do, I indulged myself with a visit to the Art Gallery.

It was lovely. They had a show of a collection that included works by Cezanne, Manet and Toulouse-Lautrec, and another of Chinese art that examines the interaction of traditional art with the modern. It was in the latter, when I was standing in front of a marvellous work – an installation of ceramic art by Liu Jianhua – that suddenly a realisation tookย  shape in my mind: visual art is something I need to experience alone. Inside my head, I was having a dialogue with an imaginary partner, telling them (it’s not a specific him or her, or it, for that matter) what I thought of this piece – half-baked sentences that bubbled up and sunk away again unfinished as my mind walked through the visual realities in front of me and then moved on to the next piece, focused on seeing. I was looking, I was responding – I was, pretentious though it may sound, communing with the art work.

In the fabulous art instruction book Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain author Betty Edwards talks about how visual art, or visual perception, primarily takes place in the right hemisphere of the brain, while the brain’s language centre is located in the left. Because of that, it’s not uncommon for artists to be unable to draw and talk at the same time. I know that’s certainly true for me – if I want to really focus on what I’m doing visually, my flow of words dries up.

I’ve had friends say “Let’s get together and make art!” Well, actually – that doesn’t do much for me. Sure, I have fun hanging around with friends and mucking about with art supplies, no question of that; but the result is practically never one of my better pieces, artistically speaking. If I am with another person, my thoughts are focused on that person – and as I think in words, by definition my brain is stuck in the wrong modus operandi for thinking of art. If I’m talking to someone else, I cannot communicate with the art.

So art is something I need to experience alone. In order to get the most of a visit to an art museum or art gallery, especially one of the calibre of the Vancouver Art Gallery, I need to be by myself. I need to be able to get stuck in front of a piece that grips me, just staring at it, letting it impact me, without having to get back out of myself and explain to whomever I’m with. It’s not that I don’t enjoy looking at art, or making art, with friends – but the experience of the art will be far more shallow than anything I could get on my own. I’d never realised it quite like that before – but for real depth, it has to be just me and the art.

So, what did you do last week? Me, I went on a date; we had some great conversations, myself and an installation of Chinese ceramics in celadon and oxblood glazes. We got real close.

Life, the Universe, Myself and Art. It’s got to be just the two of us.

2139PS: I wanted to post a picture of that marvellous Liu Jianhua piece, “Container”, but sadly, I don’t think it would be right under the fair use copyright law. If you go here and scroll down, the second picture on the left is of an earlier installation of the same work; at the VAG it was sitting on white ground, which made it even more amazing. But just so you’re not deprived of a photo of an interesting piece of pottery, here’s one of mine: “Squashpot, Untitled (2011)”. Yes, I know, it’s stunning.

Advertisements

7 Comments

Filed under art, this and that

7 responses to “Just Me and Art

  1. Okay, to start, I have to say that your little piece of artwork pottery is better than anything I could ever do!! It’s cute. And yes…stunning. ๐Ÿ™‚

    I agree whole-heartedly. There is a thing that happens when someone meets what to them is art. I say that because I have no idea why some art is so fabulous to others, yet what is intensely meaningful to me, is “meh” to them. So, while I am sure that there must be a universal concept of what is “crappy” art, I wouldn’t dare wager a guess as to what it is. All that said, lol, when I meet with a piece of art that has meaning to me, I must be alone with it, in silence. Now, others can be around, milling, but they can’t be “with me.” I think I experienced that sensation once when looking at Monet’s “Water Lilies.” So, I was actually at the museum in question with my sister and my husband. We had all gone our own ways drawn by our own particular interests. I was totally okay with meeting up at a certain place and time later on. Monet must be experienced from different “distances” and then afterward, just sitting in front of it. Studying it. Feeling the sensation of being pulled in, then pushed away, then in, then away again…for as long as you want to look. Like a gentle pulse. I actually felt the colors dispersing–they had just decided to wander off. Lol. Then I’d get the sense again of order, and when I did, I’d see the pattern again, and then the lilies. But all this was going on in my mind in a deep, personal, unshareable way. My sister eventually found me, because I lost track of time, and asked me what I was doing. My answer was, “Nothing. Let’s go.” Your story just reminded me of that day and how some loves must be experienced in secret.

    Liked by 1 person

    • amo

      Yes, Monet would be amazing to be in front of – overwhelming, actually. One of my art teachers said when he was younger, he got a chance to go to the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam. He was so overwhelmed being there, he said, he threw up… (I assume he made it to the bathroom first).

      Liked by 1 person

      • Yes. I can totally understand why he threw up. First of all, Monet’s works are huge. And there’s so much going on all at once that you have to take it in a bit at a time. Or you’ll literally feel motion sickness. I’m glad I don’t get car sick, because you actually do feel the intense movement of the work.

        Like

      • amo

        Actually, he didn’t upchuck from vertigo induced by the motion in the image (Van Gogh painted quite small) – it was the overwhelming emotion of seeing the work. Sheer nerves.
        Although, I can see getting motion sick with big paintings, too!

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I love your squash pot! I’m taking ceramics classes (again) at my local community college, and love to find others who enjoy the same art form. You’re a writer too, and a museum-goer, so that’s a pretty good triplet of creativeness we share in common. ๐Ÿ™‚ I look forward to reading more about everything, and to see how Camp goes for us both.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. amo

    Thanks for the comment!
    My first squashpot happened when I overthinned a little cup on the wheel, and it just sort of collapsed – and I went “Hey, I like this!” ๐Ÿ™‚ Then I just kept making them.
    Yes, I’m really looking forward to Camp, too! I think we have a really great cabin going there.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, most often our favorite pots are the odd ducks. ๐Ÿ™‚
      I’m almost ready, only 4 pages to read to be caught up with my story so I can continue on. Yay, and whew.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s